Reimagining the College Football Playoff: Tim Cowlishaw’s 16-Team Expansion Proposal for 2026
A New Era for College Football Postseason Competition
As college football continues to grow in popularity and complexity, the conversation around expanding the College Football Playoff (CFP) has intensified. Tim Cowlishaw, a veteran sports journalist with The Dallas Morning News, has introduced a comprehensive plan advocating for a 16-team playoff format starting in the 2026 season. This ambitious expansion is designed to increase competitive balance, broaden postseason access across all conferences, and elevate fan enthusiasm during the championship chase. Cowlishaw’s proposal arrives amid mounting pressure from fans, coaches, and analysts who seek a more inclusive and thrilling playoff experience, potentially reshaping the future of college football’s postseason landscape.
Transforming the Playoff Structure: Cowlishaw’s 16-Team Blueprint
Cowlishaw’s vision calls for a fundamental overhaul of the current CFP system by expanding the field to 16 teams. This model aims to resolve ongoing debates about fairness and representation by granting more programs—from powerhouse conferences to mid-major leagues—a legitimate chance to compete for the national title. The plan balances respect for tradition with innovative inclusivity, ensuring that the postseason reflects the diversity and depth of college football talent nationwide.
Under this framework, playoff berths would be allocated through a combination of automatic qualifications and at-large selections, guaranteeing spots for conference champions while rewarding high-performing teams regardless of conference affiliation. The proposed selection breakdown is as follows:
| Category | Number of Teams |
|---|---|
| Champions of Power Five Conferences | 5 |
| Top Group of Five Conference Champion | 1 |
| At-Large Selections (Highest Ranked) | 10 |
- Expanded postseason opportunities for programs beyond the traditional elite
- Maintained significance of regular season and conference championships
- Enhanced financial benefits for schools and conferences through additional high-profile games
Comprehensive Overview of the 16-Team Playoff Format and Selection Process
At the core of Cowlishaw’s proposal is a playoff bracket that guarantees all Power Five conference champions—ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac-12, and SEC—a spot in the postseason. Additionally, the highest-ranked Group of Five champion secures an automatic berth, ensuring representation from smaller conferences. The remaining ten slots are filled by at-large teams chosen based on their overall performance, strength of schedule, and rankings determined by the CFP selection committee.
This hybrid selection method combines objective data with expert judgment to create a transparent and equitable system. It aims to reduce the controversies that have plagued the current four-team format by rewarding consistent excellence and competitive merit. Key elements include:
- Guaranteed entry for all Power Five champions
- Reserved position for the highest-ranked Group of Five champion
- At-large bids awarded based on comprehensive rankings and performance metrics
- Seeding advantages for top teams, including home-field benefits in early rounds
| Seed Range | Description | Qualification Method |
|---|---|---|
| 1–5 | Power Five Conference Champions | Automatic Qualification |
| 6 | Highest-Ranked Group of Five Champion | Automatic Qualification |
| 7–16 | At-Large Teams | Selection Committee Decision |
Evaluating the Effects on Power Five and Group of Five Conferences
The shift to a 16-team playoff format would mark a transformative moment for college football, offering expanded visibility and opportunity for both Power Five and Group of Five programs. Power conferences such as the SEC, Big Ten, and ACC are expected to maintain their stronghold, leveraging additional playoff spots to highlight their depth and talent. Meanwhile, the expanded field provides a meaningful pathway for Group of Five teams to gain national recognition, potentially earning at-large bids based on merit rather than solely on conference championships.
Anticipated impacts include:
- Increased national exposure for mid-major programs, boosting recruiting and funding prospects
- Potential realignment pressures as Group of Five schools seek to elevate their status
- Growth in commercial revenue driven by a larger slate of high-stakes games featuring diverse teams
- Strategic scheduling adjustments by Power Five teams to secure favorable playoff positioning
| Conference | Projected Playoff Berths | Group of Five Access Level |
|---|---|---|
| SEC | 4–5 | Limited |
| Big Ten | 3–4 | Limited |
| ACC | 2–3 | Moderate |
| Group of Five | 2–4 | Significant |
Ensuring Equity and Competitive Integrity in the Expanded Playoff
To uphold fairness within the expanded 16-team playoff, transparency and consistency in the selection process are essential. Adopting a robust, data-driven ranking system that incorporates strength of schedule, conference titles, and head-to-head matchups will reduce subjective bias and guarantee that the most deserving teams qualify. Furthermore, establishing an independent selection committee with diverse representation from all conferences can help balance perspectives and foster impartiality.
Beyond selection, maintaining competitive balance requires thoughtful scheduling and logistical planning. Key recommendations include:
- Seeding teams based on comprehensive performance analytics to promote competitive matchups and avoid early blowouts
- Geographically considerate brackets to minimize travel demands on student-athletes, preserving their health and performance
- Equitable revenue sharing models to support growth and sustainability for smaller programs, encouraging parity across the sport
| Recommendation | Objective | Anticipated Benefit |
|---|---|---|
| Data-Driven Selection | Objective Team Assessment | Increased Credibility and Transparency |
| Geographic Seeding | Reduce Travel Fatigue | Improved Athlete Welfare and Performance |
| Revenue Sharing Framework | Support Program Development | Greater Competitive Balance Across Conferences |
Looking Ahead: The Future of College Football’s Postseason
Tim Cowlishaw’s proposal to expand the College Football Playoff to 16 teams starting in 2026 signals a transformative moment for the sport. By fostering inclusivity and intensifying competition, this plan addresses long-standing concerns about equitable access for programs outside the traditional powerhouses. As conference leaders and governing bodies evaluate the proposal, the college football community eagerly anticipates a new chapter that could redefine how champions are crowned. The coming months will be crucial in shaping a playoff system that balances tradition, fairness, and excitement for fans nationwide.







